|
Note 4: Long-Term Debt and Other Financial Instruments
Long-term
debt at December 26, 1999, and December 27, 1998,
was as follows:
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
850,000
|
|
8.62% senior notes due
annually from 2000 to
2002
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
7.125% revenue bonds due
2022
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Bank lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
Less: current maturity
of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
(13,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
$
|
46,838
|
|
|
|
$
|
928,101
|
|
In
December 1996, the Company entered into a seven-year
revolving credit facility committing a syndicate
of banks to lend the Company up to $1.2 billion.
This facility has mandatory commitment reductions
of 25% at the end of 2001 and 2002. Interest rates
under the facility are typically based on the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin
ranging from .225% to .75%, based on the Companys
debt to cash flow ratio (leverage ratio), as defined.
Under this facility, the Company pays commitment
fees (.10% at December 26, 1999) on the unused
portion of the facility at a rate based on its
leverage ratio. In October 1999, the Company used
proceeds from the sale of its cable operations
(see Note 2) to repay all amounts outstanding
under its revolving credit agreements. The associated
interest rate swap agreements covering $725 million
of that debt, representing all of the Companys
swap agreements, were terminated as well, resulting
in an extraordinary charge of $1.3 million ($0.05
per share, both basic and assuming dilution),
net of a $.8 million tax benefit.
In 1992, the Company issued $20 million of New
Jersey Economic Development Authority tax-exempt
revenue bonds. The bonds are secured by a letter
of credit, under which the Company pays an annual
fee equal to .125% plus a margin (.30% at December
26, 1999) based on the Companys leverage
ratio. The bonds contain certain optional and
mandatory redemption provisions, and the bond
proceeds were restricted for capital expenditures
related to the Companys Garden State Paper
newsprint operations in New Jersey.
The Companys debt covenants contain a minimum
net worth requirement ($405.5 million at December
26, 1999), and require the maintenance of an interest
coverage ratio and a leverage ratio, as defined.
Long-term debt maturities during the five years
subsequent to December 26, 1999, aggregating $39.8
million, are as follows: 2000 $13 million;
2001 $13.3 million; 2002 $13.2 million;
2003 $.2 million; 2004 $.1 million.
At December 27, 1998, the Company had borrowings
of $5 million from bank lines and $13 million
of senior notes due within one year classified
as long-term debt in accordance with the Companys
intention and ability to refinance these obligations
on a long-term basis under existing facilities.
The interest rate on the bank lines was 5.04%
at December 27, 1998.
In June 1998 Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, was issued;
it is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000, under the provisions of its amendment,
SFAS No. 137, Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133. When adopted by
the Company, any derivatives that the Company
then had would be recognized on the balance sheet
at fair value. Derivatives that were not hedges
would be adjusted to fair value through income.
If a derivative was a hedge, depending upon the
nature of the hedge, a change in its fair value
would either be offset against the change in the
fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities,
or firm commitments through earnings, or recognized
in other comprehensive income until the hedged
item was recognized in earnings.
The
table below includes information about the carrying
values and estimated fair values of the Company’s
financial instruments:
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
1998
|
|
| |
|
|
Carrying
Amounts
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amounts
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ivestment
in Denver Preferred Stock
(Note 3)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,702
|
|
$
|
53,953
|
|
Investment
in Hoovers, Inc.
|
|
|
|
19,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,378
|
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
7,120
|
|
Investment
in ReacTV
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
8.62%
senior notes
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,696
|
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
54,057
|
|
7.125%
revenue bonds
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,023
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
22,287
|
|
Bank
lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,784
|
|
In
1998, the fair value of the Companys investment
in Denver Preferred Stock, which was not publicly
traded, was estimated by discounting expected
future cash flows using a current market rate
applicable to the yield, credit quality and maturity
of the investment. In July 1999, Hoovers
sold stock to the public and began trading on
the NASDAQ stock exchange resulting in a readily
determinable value of its stock. Under the provisions
of SFAS No. 115, Accounting For Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, the Companys
investment in Hoovers was classified as
available-for-sale and carried at fair value,
with unrealized gains, net of tax, reported as
a separate component of stockholders equity.
In 1998, the fair value of the Companys
investment in Hoovers, which was not publicly
traded at that time, was based on prices recently
paid for shares of the company. The Companys
investment in ReacTV approximates its fair value.
In 1998, the fair values of the interest rate
swaps were based on the estimated amounts the
Company would have received or paid to terminate
the swaps. Fair values of the Companys long-term
debt were estimated, in both years, using discounted
cash flow analyses based on the Companys
incremental borrowing rates for similar types
of borrowings. In 1998, the borrowings under the
Companys revolving credit facility and bank
lines approximated their fair value.
Return
to Notes Index
|